🔗 Share this article

Iran is prepared to resume nuclear discussions with Washington provided that it is approached with "dignity" and "honor", Tehran's foreign minister has declared.

The Iranian diplomat declared exclusively dialogue worked, and shared new appeals had been made by mediators to resume negotiations with the US government. He said Iran had zero unreported enrichment locations, and Iran was not yet able to allow the global atomic watchdog to inspect bombed nuclear sites for security reasons.

Navigating a Challenging Path

Araghchi is walking a challenging route since Iran wishes not to appear to be operating from a position of vulnerability, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had emerged more powerful in military terms and psychologically from the joint assault on its atomic facilities in June.

He was speaking at a defense forum in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to refine atomic fuel on home soil that it will never give up" – the main reason of the stalemate in the earlier negotiations.

Previous Negotiations Suddenly Concluded

The previous five rounds of talks between the United States and Iran were ended suddenly and bitter termination on 12 June when Israel, with US support, targeted Iran's enrichment centers in a fortnight-long engagement that culminated with the US president asserting the locations had been eliminated. Afterward, Western states used their authority to restore global restrictions, but Iran insists they have not had a substantial consequence.

Magic Solution Suggested

Tehran representatives claimed they felt they had attained a "magic solution" to the enrichment issue in earlier negotiations, when it was decided an local partnership with Washington's engagement could enrich uranium. The two nations would have been able to claim victory since local refinement would have continued and the US could be assured that Iran's enrichment initiative was entirely non-military.

It had not been agreed in the negotiations that US nuclear scientists could operate inside Iran, but that was a logical implication of the cooperative offer. Diplomats asserted on multiple occasions they had achieved a deal with Trump's special envoy the US official only for the arrangement to collapse due to "spoilers in Washington".

Existing Position

Tehran representatives declared the consortium offer was now no longer available, but it seems quite possible the proposal could be revived in some form if talks restart.

Trump in recent days claimed he had been getting signals that Iran desired to reopen negotiations, but confidentially Iranian officials state they are not yet obtaining consistent overtures from Washington either directly or from key regional mediators, such as Qatar, the Egyptian leadership, Oman and the Saudi kingdom. The Iran's state department has been accused of non-responsiveness in the aftermath of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Iran says dialogue is not part of a performance.

Diplomatic Position

In his remarks to the conference, designed to portray the US as a controlling nation that misuses the idea of global regulations, the foreign minister stated the two-week conflict revealed the dispute could not be resolved by armed force. He asserted the assaults began with a US demand for an unconditional Iranian surrender and culminated with an unconditional call for a truce.

Iran is convinced the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were mounted with full US knowledge and coordination, making faith challenging to restore.

Dialogue Remains the Final Answer

The foreign minister stated: "Tehran was not the one that had fled diplomacy; it was America and the western countries that had consistently tried to impose their demands during the talks. Negotiations can still be alive and remains the primary resolution to address disagreements, but its requirements, rules and tenets must be respected."

"If they address to the nation of Iran with the approach of respect and respect, they will get a response in the same approach."

Repair and Rebuilding

In what is portrayed by Iranian officials as the battle of repair and reconstruction, Araghchi said he was assured Iran's defence capabilities "are considerably enhanced than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been rebuilt. We gained multiple understandings from this engagement; we have discovered our personal limitations and the vulnerabilities of the adversary."

He continued: "We managed to survive this engagement. Our atomic expertise, which they aimed to destroy, continues to exist. The facilities and machinery, if damaged, will be restored; what is crucial is the resolve of the citizens of Tehran and then the national cohesion that they aimed at, but failed to break. The Iranian people have grown more powerful, more integrated, and more supportive of the government and the nation in the aftermath of this assault."